Over the past few days, the National Corn Growers Association (NCGA) and presidents from 23 of its state affiliates have written President Joe Biden about the potential ban on biotech corn. NCGA noted farmers are making planting decisions for next spring, and the crop harvested next fall could potentially fall under Mexico’s decree.
On Thursday, a bipartisan letter from 26 U.S. senators also wrote Vilsack and the U.S. Trade Representative raising similar concerns.
“These actions are unsupported by science and a breach of USMCA. It would be detrimental to food security in Mexico, hurt U.S. agricultural sustainability, and stifle future agricultural technology innovations that would benefit both nations. While we appreciate the efforts of USTR and USDA to resolve this issue by engaging with Mexican officials, we also encourage the administration to consider all options available in an effort to hold Mexico to their trade commitments including pursuing a dispute settlement process through USMCA,” the senators wrote in their letter.
Vilsack reiterated the U.S. continues to “have deep concerns about the presidential decree. We think that it is not based on science. And we also think it raises serious issued on the USMCA trade agreement.”
“We’ve expressed in no uncertain terms that it needs to be rectified, needs to be modified and changed, that it is not only in the best interest of our corn growers, it’s also as importantly in the best interest of the livestock industry in Mexico.”
As much as 66% of the yellow corn and DDGs (dried distillers’ grain) fed in Mexico comes from the U.S., Vilsack said. “And there’s no way that Mexico can either grow or import a replacement,” he said. “Anything that they would import would be extremely expensive, probably 100% more than what they’re currently spending.”
Mexico risks reducing its own livestock industry, which would then translate into driving up food costs for Mexican consumers. Vilsack said he hopes Ebrard presents a proposal that rectifies the situation.
“However, I was clear with the president (Obrador) and I would be equally clear with the foreign minister and whoever else is in attendance, that if the proposal doesn’t meet what we think is consistent with the science and does what we think is consistent with the USMCA, that we absolutely will continue to work with the U.S. Trade Representative’s Office to begin the process of triggering whatever needs to be triggered under the USMCA. And that hasn’t changed. It’s not going to change.”
Chris Clayton can be reached at [email protected]
Follow him on Twitter @ChrisClaytonDTN
(c) Copyright 2022 DTN, LLC. All rights reserved.
This content was originally published here.